Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Fascism
What is so offensive about calling free speech a God-given right?

Surely you don’t have to be a believer to think that free speech is not something given to you by the state.

Posted 2 months ago
66 notes
Tagged: atheism, christianity, free speech, communismkills, .
  1. maxlibertarios reblogged this from everyonehatedmyoldtheme and added:
    States do not “give” rights. Things like the second amendment to the constitution are meant to be rules for the state so...
  2. bmxchris256 reblogged this from maxlibertarios
  3. apostolicflow reblogged this from only-conservative-here
  4. madrid-taco reblogged this from maxlibertarios and added:
    Don’t rights come from some form of consensus, or from your cognitive abilities at the very least? Or are we talking...
  5. geghideivant reblogged this from maxlibertarios and added:
    Someone’s feeling argumentative.
  6. everyonehatedmyoldtheme reblogged this from maxlibertarios and added:
    Can you please explain your point? I don’t understand specifically why you would infer that rights must come from either...
  7. anasylumonehundredfold reblogged this from entropic-dissonance and added:
    “God-given” doesn’t mean literally “given by god(s)”. It means something somebody ought to have, based on thee same...
  8. 7th-pillar reblogged this from jillithelibertarian and added:
    “Is it not written that ye are Gods?” ~ Jeshua the Nazarene
  9. fil-ann-xoxo reblogged this from collegethenlife
  10. mederow reblogged this from c0ldchills
  11. nathanialroyale reblogged this from heroinfriday
  12. c0ldchills reblogged this from only-conservative-here
  13. only-conservative-here reblogged this from libertarian-dharma-initiative
  14. heroinfriday reblogged this from libertarian-dharma-initiative and added:
    George Carlin answered this beautifully //www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9-R8T1SuG4 -Morgan
  15. collegethenlife reblogged this from libertarian-dharma-initiative
  16. entropic-dissonance reblogged this from libertarian-dharma-initiative and added:
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^fucking this it’s just a saying no need to get your jimmies rustled
  17. atheistrose reblogged this from libertarian-dharma-initiative and added:
    Who said it was offensive? It’s just exclusive...all. It seems that you’re trying
  18. sgv-626 reblogged this from thatwhitemexican
  19. yukithemeddler reblogged this from the-rhythm and added:
    Surely there is nothing wrong with calling it a HUMAN right, now is there? There is absolutely no need to add anything...
  20. jillithelibertarian reblogged this from libertarian-dharma-initiative
  21. dmz1995 reblogged this from everythingwithaconservativetwist
  22. thatwhitemexican reblogged this from everythingwithaconservativetwist
  23. life-on-your-death-bed reblogged this from everythingwithaconservativetwist
  24. everythingwithaconservativetwist reblogged this from libertarian-dharma-initiative
  25. the-rhythm reblogged this from goddamntoothbrush
  26. goddamntoothbrush reblogged this from libertarian-dharma-initiative and added:
    But free speech isn’t granted. It’s assumed. It’s the default.